Shakespeare and Language
Subtitle
Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance
Our understanding of words, and how they get their meanings, relies on a stable spelling system and dictionary definitions — things which simply did not exist in the Renaissance. At that time, language was speech rather than writing; a word was by definition a collection of sounds not letters — and the consequences of this run deep. They explain our culture's inability to fully appreciate Shakespeare's wordplay and they also account for the rift that opened up between Shakespeare and us as language came to be regarded as essentially "written."
In "Shakespeare and Language," Jonathan Hope considers the ideas about language that separate us from Shakespeare. His comprehensive study explores the visual iconography of language in the Renaissance, the influence of the rhetorical tradition, the extent to which Shakespeare's late style is driven by a desire to increase the subjective content of the text and contemporary ways of studying his language using computers.
Bio
Jonathan Hope is professor of English in literature at Arizona State University.
Praise for this book
This book is nothing short of brilliant. It is bursting with new observations, pithy readings and sensitive analyses. One of Hope's skills is to show us that 'language' is not separable from 'ideas'; both are systems of representation. This is a book about words, conventions, artifice, mythology, innovation, reason, eloquence, silence, control, communication, selfhood, dialect, 'late style' and much, much more. After reading Hope's book you will never read Shakespeare in the same way.
Professor Laurie Maguire Magdalen College, Oxford
